<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0"><channel><title>th3.p®ph3t1z3r'z WinCustomize Site Comments - Brought to you by JoeUser</title><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/rss/comments</link><copyright>© 2006 - 2008 Stardock Corporation. All rights reserved.</copyright><description>hhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm   how should i know, i just started it and never created a skin in my life.   HMMMMM i guess i'll go try and make a WB skin now.</description><language>en-us</language><pubDate>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDate><lastBuildDate>2008-05-16T03:31:52</lastBuildDate><docs>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/rss.html</docs><generator>Stardock Rss Generator v1.0, Andrew Powell</generator><managingEditor>info@stardock.com</managingEditor><webMaster>apowell@stardock.com</webMaster><item><author>Pantaleao</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">Why not just write the changes to a reg file and merge after an update?</div><br/>I guess I'm an optimist, so that I'm always thinking stardock's going to fix this annoyance right at the next version... a reg file would be the ultimate surrender signal by me (I guess...)  <img src="http://images.stardock.com/smiles/Ew.gif" border=0 align="absmiddle"> <br/><br/>No, seriously, I can't understand why it'd be difficult giving the user a chance for changing this kind of setting if he or she feels like doing so. Just a small change but with a huge meaning for those who need. Think about that! (it's still time for the big announcement at this month's end...)]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Pantaleao on How do i change default Storage location for stuff, such as Dreams?</title></item><item><author>Zubaz</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">It's a royal pain in the ass having to manually edit the windows
registry everytime I install a new</div>Why not just write the
changes to a reg file and merge after an update?]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Zubaz on How do i change default Storage location for stuff, such as Dreams?</title></item><item><author>Pantaleao</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</comments><description><![CDATA[I face the same problem... It's a royal pain in the ass having to manually edit the <B>windows registry</B> <U><I>everytime</I></U> I install a new (beta or not) version of WB. Two different keys - HKLM and HKCU (not sure if these two are enough!!) - must be modified just to point to WB folder at my D: driver (not the windows one) as I don't have enough space where your installer insists that my <B>huge</B> skin collection should be stored; that's truly nonsense and sad...   <img src="http://images.stardock.com/smiles/Sad.gif" border=0 align="absmiddle"> <br/>As a professional software developer I cannot understand why it's so difficult to get user input and use it to solve a very common problem - as can be depicted from the many entries allover stardock forums.<br/>You should really try to solve this so annoying problem; I'm sure the user community would appreciate it very much!]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Pantaleao on How do i change default Storage location for stuff, such as Dreams?</title></item><item><author>Zubaz</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/304407</comments><description><![CDATA[Do the three dreams that were part of the update working?<br>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/304407</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/304407</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Zubaz on Descapes just stopped working</title></item><item><author>Seabass</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</comments><description><![CDATA[That is correct Object Dock wants things more orgainzed for it. I recomend keeping image in the set location to keep things running well for you. As to sound packager it is something of the same. In that case through it is like the Cursor XP and FX programs. To launch them from the list within the software it needs to be in the defualt locations.
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Seabass on How do i change default Storage location for stuff, such as Dreams?</title></item><item><author>Seabass</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</comments><description><![CDATA[CarGuy pretty much said it. Whereever the file might be when you apply it the dream gets loaded from that location. Keeping them anywhere else still works.
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Seabass on How do i change default Storage location for stuff, such as Dreams?</title></item><item><author>CarGuy1</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</comments><description><![CDATA[You can store them where ever you want. When I download a dream, I download it to the desktop and then move it to my external hard drive. I then open up the desktop folder, where you would assign your wallpaper, to assign the dream as wallpaper. <br/>The first time you will have to browse to the folder you have them stored in and after that it will become your default storage folder, as long as you have a dream running it will always open to that folder.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>CarGuy1 on How do i change default Storage location for stuff, such as Dreams?</title></item><item><author>Seabass</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</comments><description><![CDATA[Depends if you are downloading them or simply opening them with the download links. However since some of the file sizes are very large in some cases I would recomend doing it by hand. Download to the desktop and only sync what you really want to send home. Just my two cents on this matter.
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/300920</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Seabass on How do i change default Storage location for stuff, such as Dreams?</title></item><item><author>Seabass</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</comments><description><![CDATA[Soon Window FX and the new CursorFX will be available. Cursor should work fine, WindowFX is still in the air.
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Seabass on list of 32bit and 64bit support?</title></item><item><author>DandoB</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">32 bit mode is fine, as long as they run i don't care. but i remember wb6 wouldn't run at all in vista x64 at the start. so thats what i'm trying to avoid. </div><br/><br/>Hope this helps also.  I have the following Stardock apps running on Vista 64.<br/><br/>WindowBlinds 6<br/>IconPackager<br/>TweakVista<br/>ObjectBar<br/>Desktop X (with minor issues - not all the plugins work correctly)<br/>Skin Studio<br/>ObjectDock Plus<br/>Right Click<br/>SoundPackager<br/>Component Tray]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>DandoB on list of 32bit and 64bit support?</title></item><item><author>Astyanax0</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">32 bit mode is fine, as long as they run i don't care. but i remember wb6 wouldn't run at all in vista x64 at the start. so thats what i'm trying to avoid. </div><br/><br/>its worked fine for me since the pre release beta they had.]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Astyanax0 on list of 32bit and 64bit support?</title></item><item><author>Astyanax0</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">i understand those 2 are now working, what about the rest of the OD suite? </div><br/><br/>Sound Packager works, SKS6 beta works, DeskScapes and TweakVista. There are a few others that work. Not all are native 64bit (some in 32bit mode, like SKS6 for example).]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Astyanax0 on list of 32bit and 64bit support?</title></item><item><author>Seabass</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</comments><description><![CDATA[Official notes don't get released until the full package does. Then the description on the website gets updated along with the Stardock Central ones.<br><br>I can confirm for you what Astyanax0 said. I have 64bit Vista running skinned and with icons under the current beta of both programs.<br><br>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Seabass on list of 32bit and 64bit support?</title></item><item><author>Astyanax0</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">windowsblinds i was told it would work with 64bit when version 6 was released, but still no 64bit support. is stardock taking cue's from sony? lol</div><br/><br/>it does and has worked, it has some problems though. theres also a beta of iconpackager that works with vista x64]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Astyanax0 on list of 32bit and 64bit support?</title></item><item><author>milksama</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</comments><description><![CDATA[<P>As far as I am aware there is just the <EM>System Requirements</EM> sections on the product pages at the moment, i.e. <A href="http://stardock.com/products/windowblinds">WindowBlinds</A>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Regarding Vista compatibility (though it's more of a guide detailing&nbsp;<EM>ballpark</EM>&nbsp;project deadlines), Zoomba created this chart:<BR><A href="http://www.wincustomize.com/%5Carticles.aspx?aid=153286">http://www.wincustomize.com/%5Carticles.aspx?aid=153286</A></P>
<P>-Mike<BR>[Stardock Support]</P>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169970</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>milksama on list of 32bit and 64bit support?</title></item><item><author>Zubaz</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169481</comments><description><![CDATA[I think everything si migrating to user documents as part of the Microsofft paradigm of separating program files (that do stuff) and what data they use (like skins, or documents).
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169481</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/169481</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Zubaz on Skins Location all over, is a MESS!</title></item><item><author>neophil78</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/166564</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">to users/public/documents/stardock - which, actually works alot better i think</div><br/>Don't see any difference in performance, but i really see an UGLY difference on my storage gestion  <img onload="if(Sd.ImageResizer) Sd.ImageResizer.createOn(this);" src="smiles/Mad.gif" border=0 align="absmiddle"> <br/><br/>I want my C:\ drive datas as little as possible and untill not to far, main Stardock's where stored on my E:\ partition (taking a lot of place ...)<br/><br/>I really don't want to see them going back to C:\  <img onload="if(Sd.ImageResizer) Sd.ImageResizer.createOn(this);" src="smiles/Mad.gif" border=0 align="absmiddle">  <img onload="if(Sd.ImageResizer) Sd.ImageResizer.createOn(this);" src="smiles/Mad.gif" border=0 align="absmiddle">  <img onload="if(Sd.ImageResizer) Sd.ImageResizer.createOn(this);" src="smiles/Mad.gif" border=0 align="absmiddle">  <br/><br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/166564</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/166564</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>neophil78 on How long until a Standard Skins Folder Location?</title></item><item><author>Bichur</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/162895</comments><description><![CDATA[<div class="Article_Quote">maybe i'll hop in chat and ask</div><br/><br/>chat can be the fastest way lots o times]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/162895</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/162895</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Bichur on SDC refresh Thumbnails properly? how to?</title></item><item><author>Bichur</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/162895</comments><description><![CDATA[wouldn't say that - bear in mind even though it says Stardock Support is user helping user based.  from the support page:<br/><br/>Still need help?<br/> Email Stardock Technical Support (please give up to 48 business hours for a response) <br/> General Technical Support Inquiries (please give up to 48 business hours for a response) <br/> <B>Stardock Support Forums </B>(get help from other users - this is the fastest way!)<br/><br/>support people do come here when they can.<br/><br/><br/>I don't have Vista, but when I click skins and themes - it came up blank but immediately started downloading new libraries (takes me a long time since I'm also on dialup)<br/><br/>have you tried a right click > refresh libraries? <br/>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/162895</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/162895</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Bichur on SDC refresh Thumbnails properly? how to?</title></item><item><author>Moduliz0r</author><comments>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/142689</comments><description><![CDATA[It would make your booting up time longer, because you'd have to wait for it to apply all the icons and themes, and all that stuff.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.stardock.com/products/sdcentral/" title="Posted via Stardock Central"><img onload="if(Sd.ImageResizer) Sd.ImageResizer.createOn(this);" src="http://images.stardock.com/sd/SDC24.gif "/></a>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="True">http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/142689</guid><link>http://prophetizer.joeuser.com/article/142689</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 23:31:52 -0400</pubDate><pubDateParsed>2008-05-16T03:31:52</pubDateParsed><title>Moduliz0r on Randomize Function??? would be cool on boot</title></item></channel></rss>